La Place II
- Alberto Giacometti (1901-1966)
La Place II
signed and numbered 'A. Giacometti 1/6' (on the side of the base)
bronze with brown and black patina
Length: 25½ in. (64.7 cm.)
Conceived in 1948 and cast in 1949
- Alberto Giacometti
- La Place II
- Length: 25½ in. (64.7 cm.)
- Signed and numbered 'A. Giacometti 1/6' (on the side of the base)
- IMPRESSIONIST & MODERN ART
- Alberto Giacometti , 20th Century, Sculptures, Statues & Figures, bronze, Switzerland, Modern, figures
- Washington, D.C., Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden, Alberto Giacometti 1901-1966, September-November 1988, pp. 136-137, no. 41 (illustrated in color).
- J. Dupin, Alberto Giacometti, Paris, 1963, p. 243 (another cast illustrated).
J. Lord, Giacometti: A Biography, New York, 1986 (another cast illustrated).
Y. Bonnefoy, Alberto Giacometti: A Biography of His Work, Paris, 1991, pp. 330-331, no. 304 (another cast illustrated).
R. Hohl, ed., Giacometti: A Biography in Pictures, Stuttgart, 1998, p. 131 (another cast illustrated).
- Pierre Matisse Gallery, New York.
Acquired from the above by the family of the present owner, 18 July 1962.
- To approach and behold a single Giacometti figure--a standing woman or a walking man, for instance--is a tense and unsettling experience. Space appears to press in on it from all sides; the bronze or plaster flesh on this elongated and attenuated armature body seems tormented, even flayed and scarred by the emptiness that threatens to engulf it. Its very existence may appear fragile or ephemeral, and insinuate our innermost anxieties about distance, remoteness and solitude. This nearly weightless body strains against the indomitable press of mortality, which may be held in abeyance but can never be laid aside. Nevertheless, in more than an equivalent measure this body resists, it defies, it struggles through sheer willpower to contradict all that impinges upon it. It perseveres, and, yes, we may finally concede that it somehow prevails, however tenuously, over all these corrosive circumstances. It surmounts the space in which it stands.
Place two figures in close proximity, or three, four, even five--as seen here, in La Place II--and this dynamic instantly unfolds into further dimensions, both spatially and emotionally. The propinquity of the figures spins out a spiraling network of relationships with astonishing exponential multiplicity. In the case of La Place II, there is no single vantage point. Get down close to this sculpture and let your eye perambulate among the figures. The permutations that stem from this mere handful of hand-sized bronze elements are virtually inexhaustible. This sculpture virtually reinvents itself each time you approach it.
Giacometti created two versions of Place, perhaps better known in English as La Place and La Place II, in 1948, and had them cast in bronze the following year. The initial version (fig. 1) was Giacometti's very first multi-figure postwar sculpture, and bronze casts of it were among the first works by the sculptor enter public collections: The Museum of Modern Art acquired cast 1/6 in 1949, and the Kunstmuseum Basel purchased cast 6/6 following the exhibition they gave the artist in 1950. Cast 4/6 of City Square II is in the National Gallery of Art, Washington, and one cast, 5/6, was destroyed in a fire.
In both works Giacometti has positioned four walking men and a solitary standing woman on a broad and thick platform. La Place II differs from the first version in that figures are slightly larger, the walking man opposite the standing woman faces her less directly, and he carries his arms more tensely and closely to his side.
The overall scale and inter-related complexity of the elements in this sculpture are a far cry from the miniscule figures and heads that Giacometti brought back with him from Geneva when he returned to Paris in September 1945, following the end of the Second World War. He is said to have carried the sum of his surviving wartime production in several matchboxes that easily fit in the pockets of his overcoat. He realized that he had come to a sterile end with these "pin people." Giacometti declared: "In 1945 I swore to myself that I didn't want to let my figures get smaller and smaller, not even by an inch. But now the following happened: I could maintain the height, but they started to get narrow, narrow...tall and thin as a thread" (quoted in R. Hohl, op. cit., p. 108).
The accelerating evolution in Giacometti's work during the years 1945-1948 stemmed from a sequence of hallucinatory revelations that the sculptor experienced as he reintegrated himself within the reviving and invigorating cosmopolitan life of liberated, postwar Paris. His visions revealed the ways in which the private life of the mind contends with the public reality of the street. In December 1946 Giacometti published a visionary text in the art journal Labyrinthe which he titled Le rêve, Le Sphinx et la mort de T., referring to a favorite brothel that had just been closed down, and the death of a close friend. He wrote:
"...I had begun to see heads in the void, in the space that surrounded them. The first time I saw a head I was looking at freeze, become fixed in that single instant forever. I trembled with terror as never before in my life, and cold sweat ran down my back. This was no longer a living head, but an object which I looked at as I would look at any other object; yet not quite, not like any other object, differently, like something that was dead and alive at the same time. I let out a cry of terror as if I had just crossed over a threshold, as if I had gone into a world that nobody had seen before. All the living were dead, and this vision came back often, in the metro, in the street, in restaurants or with friends. The waiter at the Brasserie Lipp who stood motionless, bending over me, his mouth open, with no connection to the previous moment of with the following moment, his mouth open, his eyes fixed and unwavering. And at the same time as people, objects underwent a transformation: tables, chairs, clothes, streets, even trees and landscapes" (M. Peppiatt, trans., in Giacometti and Postwar Paris, exh. cat., Sainsbury Centre for Visual Arts, 2001, pp. 31-32).
Giacometti had been drawing constantly in a new, non-naturalistic manner in which the figure appears to coalesce from a web of vigorous, matchstick-like strokes. Rendered in this way against the white void of the sheet, his figures became elongated (fig. 2). In statements culled from various interviews given during the 1960s, Giacometti recalled:
"Through drawing all that began to change a little... Not until 1946 and after was I able to perceive the distance which makes people appear real and not their natural size. My visual field widened. The true revelation, the great shock that destroyed my whole conception of space and finally put me on the track I'm on today came in 1945, in the newsreel theater 'Actualités Montparnasse.' I used to go to the movies quite often earlier. I went in, saw the film, left the theater, I was in the street again, in a café--it wasn't anything special, nothing really happened at all, I mean, there wasn't the slightest difference between what I saw outside in reality and what happened on the screen. The one was the continuation of the other. Until the day they separated: instead of seeing a person on the screen I saw--influenced by the drawings I was doing at the time--unfocused black spots that moved. I looked at my neighbors--and suddenly I saw them as I had never seen them before. Not what was happening on the screen was new, but the people who were sitting next to me. On that day--I still remember exactly how I walked out into the Boulevard Montparnasse--I saw the boulevard as I had never seen it before. Everything was different, the spatial depth and the things, and the colors and the silence...for silence played a role in it too--the film I had seen was a sound film... Everything appeared different to me and completely new. Boulevard Montparnasse was dipped in the beauty of the Thousand and One Nights, fabulous, absolutely strange... Now I was eager to see more. I was, if you will, in a sort of perpetual enchantment of everything... On that day reality was revaluated for me completely; it became unknown for me, but an enchanted unknown. From that day on, because I had realized the difference between my way of seeing in the street and the way photography and films see things, I wanted to represent what I saw" (quoted in ibid., pp. 111 and 114).
During 1946-1947 Giacometti fully realized his visionary, weightless approach to sculpture. He was creating astonishing figures in attenuated vertical forms, ranging in height from only a few inches to nearly life-size. Rather than fleshing out the armature, the plaster seemed to shrink around it, as if it were clinging to it for dear life. These figures were utterly unprecedented, unless one went back to the most primitive works of the ancient man. Giacometti appeared to have taken on the challenge of reinventing the very idea of sculpture for his time.
Pierre Matisse had been virtually alone among dealers in closely following and supporting the progress of Giacometti's work since his return to Paris, and realized it was high time to give the artist a solo show, his first in almost fifteen years. This would take place in New York, which henceforth became the leading venue in the genesis and expansion of Giacometti's postwar reputation. The exhibition of twenty-nine sculptures (both early and recent), two paintings and two drawings at the Pierre Matisse Gallery which opened in January 1948 was a major event. It proved to be a commercial success, and was the talk of the art world. If critical reception initially seemed hesitant, it was only because it would take time to mull over this approachable but nonetheless daunting body of work, which called into play--in a way New York had not yet experienced--many of the difficult issues that comprised the postwar zeitgeist. Selected by the sculptor himself, Jean-Paul Sartre, the leading writer and thinker of the Paris Existentialist set, had provided the introductory catalogue essay, "The Search for the Absolute," which sixty years on remains an essential, classic text. Sartre wrote:
"With space...Giacometti has to make a man; he has to write movement into the total immobility, unity into the infinite multiplicity, the absolute into the purely relative, the future into the eternally present, the chatter of signs into the obstinate silence of things... The passion of sculpture is to make oneself totally spatial, so that from the depth of space, the statue of a man may sally forth...
"But space, even if naked, is still superabundant... 'In space,' says Giacometti, 'there is too much.' This too much is pure and simple coexistence of parts in juxtaposition. Most sculptors let themselves be taken in by this; they confuse the flaccidness of extension with largesse, they put too much into their work, they delight in the fat curve of a marble hip, they spread out, thicken and expand the human gesture. Giacometti knows there is nothing redundant in a living man, because everything there is functional; he knows that space is a cancer on being, and eats everything; to sculpt, for him, is to take the fat off space; he compresses space, so as to drain off its exteriority... We know now what squeezer Giacometti used to compress space: there is only one: distance. He puts distance within reach of your hand, he thrusts before your eyes a distant woman--and she remains distant, even when you touch her with your fingertips" (quoted in K. Stiles and P. Selz, Theories and Documents of Contemporary Art, Berkeley, 1996, pp. 185 and 186).
Although Giacometti felt bolstered by the adulation his work had received in New York, which brought him a good measure of celebrity in Paris as well, the sculptor was not about to rest on his laurels. Turning to figures in groups was the unavoidable outgrowth of the single figures of women and men, and a necessary step in avoiding undue repetition. The sculptor only needed to look around at the many plaster figures that crowded every tabletop and filled each corner in his cramped studio to visualize the potential inherent in multi-figure sculptures. Giacometti began to work on the two versions of City Square in 1948, and during this time he also modeled two versions of Three Men Walking (fig. 3). Other important multi-figure groupings followed in 1949-1950, during the period, which James Lord called Giacometti's anni mirabili, leading up to Giacometti's second New York exhibition at the Pierre Matisse Gallery in 1950. These include The Glade, The Forest and Four Figures on a Pedestal (figs. 4-6). Jacques Dupin has pointed out, "The movement of one figure leads almost inevitably to depicting the movements, conjugated or not, of several figures. An immobile figure surrounds itself with closed space. A figure in motion opens space and attracts other figures there, without however meeting them; in open space, solitude as plural" (in Giacometti: Three Essays, New York, 2003, p. 58).
Again the events in Giacometti's daily life, from his long walks on the streets of Paris, served as a catalyst. The sculptor described one such incident in conversations he held during the 1960s with Raoul-Jean Moulin and Pierre Schneider:
"Once I had to leave the Louvre, I couldn't take it anymore. Not because of the artworks, but because of the reality of all those faces I met and which snapped at me as they went by. In the street the people astound and interest me more than any sculpture or painting. Every second the people stream together and go apart, then they approach each other to get closer to one another. They unceasingly form and re-form living compositions of unbelievable complexity The men walk past each other, they pass each other without looking. Or then they stalk a woman. A woman is standing there and four men direct their steps more or less toward the spot where the woman is standing. It occurred to me that I can never make a woman in any other way than motionless, and a man always striding; when I model a woman, then motionless; a man, always walking It's the totality of this life that I want to reproduce in everything I do" (quoted in R. Hohl, op. cit., p. 135).
Giacometti's interest in depicting the coincidence of figures in an open public space looks back to several sculptures that he executed during the early 1930s, in which abstract elements share and interact within the area of the platform, such as Man, Woman, and Child, No More Play, Circuit, and especially Model for a Square (fig. 7). Hohl believes the latter sculpture to be a representation of Adam, Eve and the serpent gathered around the tree of knowledge in the Garden of Eden. Giacometti had intended to enlarge it to a height of six feet for installation in a public space, where people might freely wander among it component elements.
The narratives in these early works are abstractly symbolic and imaginary; the City Square sculptures are, on the other hand, based on everyday life. Dupin has observed just how closely Giacometti's figures represent our real experience of crossing paths with strangers on a city street:
"We walk in the street with our eyes closed. We see only through the deforming prism of contracted habits, of a blinding knowledge: we see those passersby only as we know they are. If I call this knowledge into doubt, if I purify my eye of all the mental correctives which dull and estrange it, everything changes. These same passersby issue from a wide lateral opening; the immense space which imprisons them makes them appear small, thin, nibbled by the void, almost undifferentiated and especially elongated, drawn out by the attentuation of their verticality... It is thus that the eye really sees and it is thus that Giacometti represents beings and things: in their distance, in their space, hence by depicting that space, by incorporating into his figures the distance which separates them from him" (op. cit., pp. 53-54).
It is significant that the two versions of La Place do not differ radically from each other; it was not Giacometti's intention to represent widely alternative possibilities of how figures in the street might mingle, then draw together to only pass each other and head on their way. He was aiming instead to lay down the essential phenomenon of convergence and passage in a public place. Giacometti slightly modified the figures and their positioning from the first version to the second, but the conception was already whole and absolute. There may be the appearance of randomness and accident, but this is illusory, because the positioning of the figures seems almost fated and inevitable. Dupin has reminded us, "A hidden organizer still directs the respective placing and orientation of the figures" (ibid. p. 58).
The walking men would eventually converge and collide if all proceeded to head along their chosen tracks. The standing woman exists apart from this ambulatory configuration; she is, however, the apparent destination for the man approaching her from the opposite side of the platform. A palpable degree of sexual tension exists in each of the male figures, an inference that each man is to some extent contending for the attention of the woman, or he is at least responding to her power to attract him. David Sylvester has noted that she is "waiting to one side like a street walker" (in Looking at Giacometti, New York, 1994, p. 100). The significant player in this drama is certainly the man opposite her. He seems more casually at ease in the first version and reasonably certain of a successful approach, but with his arms clenched in La Place II, in a posture of anxious anticipation, there is the dawning suggestion that his eventual tête-à- tête with her will end up in thwarted intentions and frustrated desire.
Yves Bonnefoy was, like Dupin, another important French poet who was drawn to the manifold ambiguities and metaphorical inferences so strongly inherent in Giacometti's sculpture. He has likened the La Place sculptures to the theater stage:
"The novelty in these two sculptures...resides in the suddenly crystallized impression for the observer that he is at the theater, confronting a bare stage such as soon to become the fashion, and in the presence of characters, who although silent and impenetrable, are involved in a quest which is certainly intense and might even be tragic... What happens between men, the connection with one another, proclaims itself as the theme of the work... The sculptor had come close in these unexpected compositions to what was then called 'existentialist' drama, which was concerned with the human condition at it most fundamental. But he did not learn it from the theatre of Jean-Paul Sartre, in whom thought, ideas, psychology, 'words' as Sartre himself said, predominated. He was more akin to his friend Beckett, whose constant preoccupation with absence and with instants of presence--real or dreamed--knew how to exist and maintain itself on the farther and boldest margin of language, amid the same mist which enshrouds the passersby in these two sculptures." (in Alberto Giacometti: A Biography of his Work, Paris, 1991, pp. 331 and 332).
The drama which Giacometti which directs in La Place II is based on the irresistible attraction between man and woman, the magnetic fields generated by these opposing polarities, which stem from their dissimilarity and distance. A chasm separates one from the other: this is the space that must be traversed from one side of the platform to the other before the connection is made. The outcome, however, for all we can tell, is uncertain at best. Bonnefoy wrote: "Woman and man. Presence opposed, as such, to existence which strives to accede to being: the kingdom and exile, the two opposite poles with nothing up to now to bridge the gap, to reconcile the two solitudes" (ibid., p. 332).
Giacometti welcomed the perceptive attention of poets, playwrights and philosophers; he disliked, however, overly literary and purely intellectualized efforts to make his work appear representative of their ideas, which he thought distracted from a more meaningful understanding of the essential physicality of his sculptures. He did not want his work to be viewed merely as models that reflected currently fashionable polemics about estrangement, irrationality and despair, and he refused to be held up as the avatar of the topical Existential mindset in modern sculpture and painting. His felt his work reached further back into the history of art than the writers realized, and that it was embedded more deeply in the fabric of real life than they were capable of articulating. The truth in his work became manifest where their words left off. Giacometti protested, "While working I have never thought of the theme of solitude. I have absolutely no intention of being an artist of solitude. Moreover, I must add that as a citizen and a thinking being I believe that all life is the opposite of solitude, for life consists of a fabric of relations with others... There is so much talk about the malaise throughout the world and about existential anguish, as if it were something new. All people have felt that, and at all periods" (quoted in J. Lord, Giacometti: A Biography, New York, 1985, pp. 309-310). If Giacometti needed to demonstrate his point with a single sculpture, he could have done no better than to choose La Place.
(fig. 1) Alberto Giacometti, La Place, first version, 1948. The Museum of Modern Art, New York. BARCODE 25012453
(fig. 2) Alberto Giacometti, Femme debout, 1947. Sold, Christie's New York, 9 May 2006, lot 74. BARCODE 24165617
(fig. 3) Alberto Giacometti, Three Men Walking I (Trois homes qui marchent I), 1948. Alberto-Giacometti Stiftung, Zurich. BARCODE 25012361
(fig. 4) Alberto Giacometti, The Glade (La clairière), 1950. Sold, Christie's New York, 19 May 1981, lot 354. BARCODE 25012347
(fig. 5) Alberto Giacometti, The Forest (Le forêt), 1950. The National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C. BARCODE 25012477
(fig. 6) Alberto Giacometti, Four Women on a Base (Quatre femmes sur socle), 1950. Alberto-Giacometti Stiftung, Zurich; on permanent loan to the Kunstmuseum, Basel. BARCODE 25012460
(fig. 7) Alberto Giacometti, Model for a Square (Projet pour une place), 1931-1932. Peggy Guggenheim Collection, Venice (Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation, New York). BARCODE 25012446
[artist fig] Alberto Giacometti in his Paris studio, circa 1946. BARCODE 25012354
[artist fig] Alberto Giacometti at the door of his studio, 1948. BARCODE 25012378
[artist fig] Alberto Giacometti explaining City Square (Place) at the Kunstmuseum, Basel, 1950. BARCODE 25012385
Lesen Sie mehr
* Bitte beachten Sie, dass der Preis sich nur auf den tatsächlichen erzielten Endpreis zum Zeitpunkt des Verkaufs bezieht.
Ähnliche laufende Auktionen
- Stuttgart, Deutschland
- Berlin, Deutschland
- 14d 11h
- Gebote anzeigen1 000 EUR
Bernard Buffet (1928-1999) - Place des Vosgesaus dem Album Paris, 1962Lithographie in Farben auf ArchesAbmessungen 52 x 67 cmL.l. mit Bleistift signiert und nummeriert aus einer limitierten Auflage von 150 l.r.Kommt in seiner ursprünglichen farbigen Goldrahmen,Ref: [Mourlot 37] (Mourlot 37)Lesen Sie mehr
- Assen, Niederlande
- 4d 13h
- Gebote anzeigen1 500 EUR
A dazzling delight to behold as well as to wear, this pair of clip-on earrings deserve a place in your jewelry collection. The earrings are made of 18K yellow gold and are studded with precious gemstone cabochons. ~0.65ct of sapphires, ~.70ct of emeralds, and ~1.10ct of rubies make these earrings absolutely shine!Lesen Sie mehr
- Pennsylvania, USA
- 1 100 EUR
Set of fourteen Limoges porcelain Raynaud Impressions for Pavillon Christofle dessert plates, demitasse cups and saucers featuring waterlilies motif throughout, blue trim and brand stamp at undersides.Lesen Sie mehr
- San Francisco, USA
(Vienna 1860–1926) Pair of designs for the sacred furnishing of Viennese churches, one sheet inscribed and signed Th. Melicher 1893 (?), “Entwurf für eine Kirchenpolychromierung der Canisiuskirche Wien IX. Bezirk” (design for the polychroming of Saint Canisius in Vienna, 9th district), the second sheet unsigned, watercolour and black ink on paper, 31 x 60 cm and 24 x 64 cm, framed, (2) Provenance: Private Collection, Austria The two sketches are designs for the polychroming of the nave of Vienna’s Saint Canisius Church, which was erected by Gustav Ritter von Neumann between 1899 and 1903 and was remodeled by Ladislaus Hruska in 1956. Except for a few parts, the original equipment of the church has not survived. The second sheet was executed for the “Weinhauserkirche” in Vienna-Währing, which was erected after plans by Friedrich von Schmidt, the architect and master builder of Saint-Stephen’s Cathedral. It shows the shields of coat of arms with the monograms of Christ and Mary and above them a canopy architecture, which represents a scene where, surrounded by two squires, the Roman-German Emperor Leopold I is handing over the task of Vienna’s defense to the commander in chief Count Rüdiger v. Starhemberg, Archbishop Leopold Karl Kollonitsch and to others. Kahlenberg with the monastery of Saint Joseph and the fortress and chapel of Leopoldsberg where the decisive battle against the Turks had taken place on the occasion of the second siege of Vienna through the Ottoman troops is seen in the windows in the background. The Viennese Guardian Angel, who is kneeling and commending the town’s coat of arms as a symbol for Vienna to the Holy Trinity, is seen in the scene above. The quatrefoil with a cross in its center and the inscription “In hoc signo vinces” in the tracery allude to the victory of Emperor Constantin at the Milvian Bridge in 312. The design with its religious and political implications was part of an extended cycle of glass windows for the intended church of St. Joseph in Weinhaus, which should thus serve as a monument. Instead of this cycle, however, the windows were painted after designs by Rudolf Geyling, which were executed in 1889 and are still existent today. Literature: Werner Telesko: Das “Türkengedächtnis” im Wiener Kirchenbau, in: Kulturraum Österreich, Vienna, Cologne, Weimar, 2008, p. 39. We are grateful to Alicia Ysabel Spengler for her scientific support in cataloguing the two present designs.Lesen Sie mehr
- Wien, Österreich
- 8d 8h
- Gebote anzeigen900 EUR
It's pretty unlikely that from all the basebal cards of all of the great icons in baseball history, the 1952 Topps baseball card of Mickey Mantle would ascend to become the shining symbol of an entire industry. Mantle certainly isn't considered the greatest player in the game and the 1952 Topps Mantle card isn't nearly as old or rare as cards of his iconic predecessors. And not to split hairs, but it's really not even his rookie card. However, the baseball card hobby is not one of formulaic logic and reasoning, relying merely on some combination of a player's ability and the availability of his most coveted card. No, the 1952 Topps Mickey Mantle card isn't just a mere piece of cardboard to be collected by well-financed hobbyists, its a marker that helps define a place and time in American history. Just as Wagner and Cobb were baseball pioneers at the age of the Pregressive Era, Ruth and Gehrig saw us through the Great Depression, and Williams and DiMaggio carried us to victory in World War II, a fresh-faced teenager from the heartland named Mickey Mantle became the hero of the Baby Boomer generation. Looking back on it 65 years later, we now know that the fledgling Topps Company would grow to dominate the baseball card market for well over half a century and their debut issue of Mickey Mantle, the very first card in the vaunted high-number series, would become the standard-bearer of the entire baseball card world. Offered here is one of the finest surviving examples of Mickey Mantle's 1952 Topps card to be preserved at a grade of NM/MT. This card was originally evaluated by SGC, but their determination of 86 NM+ 7.5 seemed very conservative given the extremely accurate centering, maybe just a degree or two toward the right edge, as well as the thorough color and depth of the central image and bonafide NM/MT endpoints, connected on the the right side by a pleasing mild rough cut. Upon review, the thoughtful card graders at Beckett made the decision that this beauty should take its rightful place at the NM/MT level and placed the card in a BVG 8 holder. We'd even go as far as to say there are very few at this grade level that would compare favorably to the featured example, a specimen deserving of one of the world's best collections!Lesen Sie mehr
- Castle Rock, USA
- 16d 12h
- Gebote anzeigen—
Mahogany case and serial #465916. From an East 54th St Sutton Place, NYC estate. Dimensions: 56" w x 65" l. Condition: good. Dimensions:, Condition:, Mahogany case and serial #465916. From an East 54th St Sutton Place, NYC estate. Dimensions: 56" w x 65" l. Condition: good. Est: $5,000.00 - $7,000.00Lesen Sie mehr
- New York, USA
- 11d 10h
- Gebote anzeigen4 700 EUR
These four paintings are part of a series illustrating the story of the Prophet Moses. The bible tells of how he delivered the people of Israel from slavery in Egypt and led them to the land of Canaan. “The Discovery of the Infant Moses” and “The Test of Fire of Moses” are both stories from the prophet's childhood. The third scene shows the Israelites collecting their jewellery to smelt it down and create the Golden Calf whilst Moses was on Mount Sinai receiving the tablets of the law. The fourth image depicts a scene which took place during the 40 year exodus in the desert in which Moses struck a stone with his staff and it brought forth water. These paintings, which have so far not been relined and remain largely in their original condition, were probably painted by a Lombard artist. They display stylistic parallels to the works of Federico Bianchi (1635-1719), a pupil of Giulio Cesare Procaccini.Lesen Sie mehr
- Cologne, Deutschland
- 21d 6h
- Gebote anzeigen18 000 EUR
Here we have a most amazing 3.6 carat emerald. It would be like if you opened up a green jolly rancher candy and stuck it to your finger. This emerald has the most beautiful deep green color. It's hard to take your eyes off it, but if you can, you will find some bright sparkling diamonds. The ring is currently a size 6.5 and we are happy to resize it to fit you. We understand emeralds are impossible to purchase online. We are confident you will be blown away by this one in person so we will ship it with pre-paid return packaging. If you are not in total awe, send it right back for a full refund. Seattle is also quite a beautiful place to visit. A plane ticket to fly up and see this stunner along with a stroll through Pike Place Market would be a lovely way to spend your day. We look forward to seeing you!Lesen Sie mehr
- Washington, USA
- 23 000 EUR
a large caricature drawing of assembled dignitaries, military and other local figures, including a suspicious figure in black, pouring wine with his back turned to the crowd, wearing a cockade hat, after a variant of a composition by Finucane first drawn c.1798, [19th century].⁂ Matthias Finucane (c.1778-1810) was a miniaturist and occasional caricaturist of rather obscure Irish descent, who reputedly settled in the Channel Islands after joining the army to escape a murder charge. Jersey Heritage holds the two related compositions attributed to Finucane. One a signed watercolour, with the same figures but some disposed differently, the other an overpainted lithograph corresponding exactly to this drawing, seemingly its original. The figures in the print have been numbered by hand, presumably for a key to identify the various characters, as also found in an aquatint of Finucane's similarly populated depiction of Guernsey Market Place (posthumously published by T. Clay in 1822), where the artist reputedly caricatured the subjects to a greater or lesser degree depending on their willingness to pay for the privilege of being portrayed. Our thanks to Val Nelson and Dinah Bott of Jersey Heritage and the Priaulx Library, respectively, for their assistance.Lesen Sie mehr
- Chelsea, London, Großbritannien
- 1d 5h
- Gebote anzeigen350 EUR
Johann Baptist Homann (German, b.1664-1724).1720 map of Catalonia region of Spain by cartographer Johann Baptist Homann.Place / Date: Nuremberg, c.1720.Antiquarian Map, "Principatus Cataloniae nec non Comitatuum Et Cerretaniae". Map maker: Johann Baptiste Homann.Hand ColoredOrnate colored cartouche.Dimension: 22" x 19" .Condition: Very good, not laid down, clean and well preserved.Provenance: Bedford, New York EstateLesen Sie mehr
- New York, USA
- 5d 14h
- Gebote anzeigen280 EUR
- Los Angeles, USA
- 4d 11h
- Gebote anzeigen2 800 EUR
Dramatic oversize sterling silver cuff by Oreria, with a one-of-a-kind slice of beautiful chrysoprase held in place by delicate prongs. The compelling colors of the stone elegantly match the hand-hammered surface of this cuff designed by the Florentine jewelers of Oreria.Lesen Sie mehr
- Milano, Italien
MIGHT MO ''DELUXE READING'' CANNONS - Set of 2 Identical 30'' cannons; Place the ball onto the shell guide wire, slide the ball down the wire and onto the spring until it locks, load the shell into the breech of the gun and close the breech, depress the fire button on the sid eand the shell shoots out; includes (1) shell and (4) balls; carriage of one gun is broken - Condition: Age above; Age appropriate wear; All items sold as is.Lesen Sie mehr
- Mckeesport, USA
- 10d 8h
- Gebote anzeigen80 EUR